Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Working with maven Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:09:32 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <87mvyonz6a.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <6d93ec51-ea9c-4777-a785-b00de815a1d9@googlegroups.com> <1jlz9tci8kzqn.1pd9hnpc15bl5$.dlg@40tude.net> <1304bb84-402d-4bfa-bd40-b541c5716c10@googlegroups.com> <87bnf1ocxk.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: bLmKSxgyEsD8qtT7wjgUDQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://nntp.aioe.org Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:32155 On 7/24/2015 1:03 PM, lipska the kat wrote: > On 24/07/15 15:19, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> On Friday 24 Jul 2015 12:22 CEST, lipska the kat wrote: >>> On 23/07/15 21:28, e.d.programmer@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 1:24:42 PM UTC-4, Joerg Meier wrote: >>>> You bothered to respond simply to attack, >>> >>> Welcome to comp.lang.java.programmer >>> >>> It does make me smile though, using maven is one of the many >>> per-requsites to being 'in the cool gang' here >>> >>> Not using maven marks you down as a luddite (I tried it once, didn't >>> like it) When you made a perfectly reasonable suggestion to try >>> Eclipse (just another tool, like maven) you were verbally assaulted >>> because you are (apparently) not able to '...use your own tools >> >> Well, everything is in the eye of the beholder. He was being quite >> negative about me using Maven. If you throw with mud, you should not >> be surprised you get some back. > > Negative ... NEGATIVE? are you sure. > How in $DEITY's name was he/she/it being negative? By suggesting that the way used was 1985 way! Arne