Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Martin Gregorie Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Simple if-exercises Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e5160e2be48f1ea550cf61512446f525"; logging-data="24474"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18b0H+YW1rq9fjt7oFwYoHUGjfldKZMT/I=" User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:r9QtSTt/3QFR1zxY2Yes1PWTxcM= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31446 On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:29:59 +0000, Volker Borchert wrote: > Jeff Higgins wrote: > >> Why don't we have a Quinary operator? >> x ? y LT : EQ : GT > > One of those occasions where "newer" is not "better". > > I _do_ miss FORTRAN's three-way IF statement. It would be more in the style of Java to extend the switch statement's syntax by adding pseudo constants corresponding to <, == and > so you could write something like: switch(arithmetic expression) { case LT: ....; break; case EQ: ....; break; case GT: ....; break; default: ...; break; } As a bonus, you'd also get the equivalent of LE and GE without needing any additional syntactic extensions. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |