Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jerry Stuckle Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: About concurrency and functional programming Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 16:17:16 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 21:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f0ea22b8e90f9304762d4b6484233470"; logging-data="1535"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19a6WTVl0Be6HZS2RR7Un/j5NA0dfWR60Q=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:8K443DWOr14JTGnt4XccJWtl5xo= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31258 On 3/1/2015 12:07 PM, Robbie Brown wrote: > On 01/03/15 16:29, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> On 3/1/2015 9:26 AM, Robbie Brown wrote: >>> On 01/03/15 11:34, Robert Klemme wrote: >>>> On 01.03.2015 09:41, Robbie Brown wrote: >>>>> On 01/03/15 02:28, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>>>> On 2/28/2015 4:26 PM, Robbie Brown wrote: >>>>>>> On 28/02/15 18:56, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/27/2015 6:45 PM, Ramine wrote: >>>>>>>>> You will notice that "Bartosz Milewski" is saying that object >>>>>>>>> oriented > > > >> You should try to understand what you read. And contrary to your claim, >> you do have "entrenched ideas", as you show by arguing here. And BTW, >> your "entrenched ideas" are wrong. You do not "get" this stuff. > > Ah yes, anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong. > > I've met this overblown egotistical attitude countless times over the > years. It's the single most significant contribution to project failure > in my experience. I'm sure your employers are grateful for all the extra > work the government (or whoever) has had to pay for because of your > inability to even consider that you could be in any way less than > perfect. Keep up the good work, your boss needs a new Bentley. > Oh, and BTW - EVERY project I've managed has come in on time and on (or under) budget. And every one has met the client's requirements. Some have been small projects - a few hundred person-hours. But I've had a couple with dozens of person-years. And lots in between. And my clients still want me back, even though I'm not interested. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================