Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!diablo1.news.osn.de!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!217.188.199.168.MISMATCH!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!feeder1.news.elisa.fi!uutiset.elisa.fi!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: Jukka Lahtinen Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: ensuring unreachability Organization: N/A References: X-no-archive: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tQ4lATEenPCyQVJL5k6Oa3wOemI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 10 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:40:50 +0200 NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.155.88.191 X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@saunalahti.com X-Trace: uutiset.elisa.fi 1424270450 91.155.88.191 (Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:40:50 EET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:40:50 EET Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31145 Eric Sosman writes: > Remember, the underlying purpose is to guard against a > maintainer who might inadvertently introduce a fall-through. Why not just insert the break; for every case? That's what it is for. -- Jukka Lahtinen