Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeff Higgins Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: A "current directory" concept for Java... Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:40:54 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 21:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b896cb427f8c4d19d14880347aa9d6ce"; logging-data="25625"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186Cc1iKbb0Xccpssxeg25r67hBRiZCJz4=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:6LF0a++bXTdcuf3LxZIM+zzkdi8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:29828 On 08/23/2014 11:32 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > Jeff Higgins wrote: >> It seems to me that a "process" might have a notion of a >> "current directory". And that a file system "traverser" >> might have its notion of a "current directory". But any >> set of classes implementing a "virtual file system" wouldn't >> need the concept of a "current directory". May be that there >> is better place to "home" the abstraction. > > I'm afraid, I don't quite get the point of this nor your > other two posts in this thread. > Java Service Wrapper Hint: The source covers much of the ground your recent posts suggest you are exploring.