Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?b?xLVlc3M=?= stone Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: How to make my java applets more user friendly Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 85 Message-ID: References: <04c1fe18-b023-4f45-8fa3-3c2f78cba69e@googlegroups.com> <53ba5a2c$0$2846$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <53ba6e3e$0$2967$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <53bbc619$0$2933$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <53bbd269$0$2960$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: wAuFKccBCCjTm/NTpdsuUQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:29018 In article xg3fxblotela.w3fewhq11ss7$.dlg@40tude.net, Joerg Meier said... > But it does change whether something is perceived as a request for > additional information or as an attack on the poster. Your hallucinations are not my concern. Understanding the meaning of your original post is my concern. > Something you seem perfectly well aware of, considering you yourself > cut it out when you [implies dishonesty on my part] No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > Yeah, and then I travelled back in time to establish this, uh, > "nymshift" (seriously, are you [implied insult deleted] ?) [calls me a > liar]. That's exactly how that went. You [multiple implied insults > deleted]. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > Go to www.google.com. Enter what you are curious about, in this case, > "IoT". Press enter. Read first result. If that actually works, with such a tiny query, then it's by pure accident, since there have to be a zillion unrelated circumstances where those three letters appear in that sequence. And that means that even had I done so, I would have had no way of knowing which, if any, of the results I got actually had to do with your post. Perhaps the fifth, or the tenth, or none of them. > That's how easy it would have been to get your question answered if you > actually cared to get it answered and not [false accusation deleted] None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > You are [insult deleted] No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > assumed that in a technical forum, most posters were familiar with > contemporary, topic related language. I am familiar with contemporary, Java-related language, but "IoT" is not a member of that set. > Explaining every word and term one uses because it's possible that one > of the participants of the discussion has been [insult deleted] and is > [insult deleted] does not seem like a sensible use of anyones time. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. Nobody is asking you to explain every word; just to expand abbreviations that a Java developer may not know. > It seems like out of all the participants, you are the only one who > didn't understand I'm the first of them to post. Once I posted, the others had no reason to ask as well as those would then just be pointless "me, too" posts. So it will be common for there to be only one response asking a question. > and your lack of understanding quite clearly stems from your [insult > deleted] in order to overcome your own [insult deleted]. No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > I don't see why anyone would go through the effort of explaining > something to you when you yourself are so [insult deleted], while at > the same time being [insult deleted] and [insult deleted]. As someone > new to this forum, you have [insult deleted]. No! None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > [suspected insult deleted], > Joerg None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true.