Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Maher Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Java vs JavaScript Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:05:22 +0800 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <53583247$0$2956$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: jOhPn0KFjrxwuMc9OPMmCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:28258 On 4/27/2014 7:20 PM, Chris Uppal wrote: > > Agreed that this is not the way to design a security arhutecture if you have > the opportunity to build the thing from the ground up. (Of course, the > designers were in a tearing hurry at the time this stuff was set in stone). Really? > > > Agreed that JS gains some security from the fact that it just doesn't have the > ability to touch as much as the Java runtime https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI