Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: OO Design Patterns vs FP
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:31:09 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <l2hl8f$7p4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <l2gi7f$3gc$1@news.albasani.net> <l2he49$rka$1@dont-email.me> <l2hh3u$be$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:30:56 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6b9e92482af47766954d85fb77d372f5"; logging-data="7972"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uflYrQ7wJx4PGoiVW96c8YFBmSBjpxDs="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
In-Reply-To: <l2hh3u$be$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UYuhmYlK3ff8Y1ubeE8kUe+U6lM=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25433

On 10/02/2013 12:21 PM, Sebastian wrote:
> Am 02.10.2013 17:29, schrieb Jeff Higgins:
>> On 10/02/2013 03:33 AM, Sebastian wrote:
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> has anyone written about the relation of OO design patterns (by which I
>>> mean the usual GoF patterns) to functional programming idioms?
>>>
>>
>> relation+of+OO+design+patterns+to+functional+programming+idioms
>> <http://bit.ly/15ILqCW>
>
> I did Google a bit before posting, you know. One finds a couple of more
> or less incoherent discussions on blog posts, then one finds very
> theoretically-minded stuff that's sort of _inside_ FP.

The subject has been widely bantered about.
Here's one discussion begun in 2008:
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/327955/does-functional-programming-replace-gof-design-patterns?rq=1>