Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Upcoming deployment rule-set
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:49:38 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <kvgpim$dpl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <kvf6vk$c8j$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kvf7q1$ek1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kvffpe$ohc$1@dont-email.me> <kvgmfu$jcr$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:49:42 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0d73d8cc209bff1c6395088b400d0605"; logging-data="14133"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bpwCRnI39gFDnjJbhs8Ku"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
In-Reply-To: <kvgmfu$jcr$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YnF2+ZoRflZWHiAgI2jby0zDTTo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25144

On 8/26/2013 6:57 PM, Richard Maher wrote:
> On 8/26/2013 7:56 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
>> On 8/26/2013 5:40 AM, Richard Maher wrote:
>>> [...] bollocks [...] SHIT [...] useless wanker [...]
>>> fuck-up [...] fuck [...] knob-jockeys [...]
>>
>>      Don't hold back, Dick.
>
> I was about to claim I was quoted out of context but you seem to have
> paraphrased my feelings on the subject far more eloquently than I.

     Your eloquence serves as an example to all.  Too many, alas,
follow your sorry example.

> While my posts may not be up there with Oscar Wilde, I do claim to have
> captured the Java zeit-gheist perfectly. All these talentless,

     Zeitgeist.

> are just beads and trinckets to keep you happy on the server-reservation

     Trinkets.

> What is wrong with you people? Has TV de-sensatized you to violence and

     De-sensitized (hyphen optional).

> injustice that you can no longer get angry at someone who wreaking havoc
> on your likelihoods?

     "Likelihoods?"  Frankly, I wish posts like yours were in truth
less probable instead of being so oppressively common, also common.

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid