Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Sosman Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: multiple inheritance in Java Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:40:43 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 17:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0d73d8cc209bff1c6395088b400d0605"; logging-data="8080"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+daYM3VlFdJXzmo9UJqV6w" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:MMfkTCNGyF+eiwZoCXc35X2JtDs= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:24592 On 7/2/2013 1:17 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: > On 07/02/2013 12:09 AM, Eric Sosman wrote: >> Okay. It might have been clearer if you'd chosen names that >> weren't already taken -- although, one must admit, that's not easy >> to do with Java's ever-growing namespace bloat. (Factoid: The HTML >> *index* for the 7.0 API occupies eighteen meg!) >> > > Java never throws anything away. I wonder about a compatibility layer. > rt.jar would contain all of the current stuff, rtc.jar the old. Not sure what the separation would accomplish. All the package names would remain unchanged, all the class and method and field names would remain unchanged, the JavaDoc would still have to describe them all, and the JVM would need to open one more file than it already does. > On the plus side, I can now do this: > public class Scratch { > public static void main(String[] args) { > int mySSNumber = 000_00_0000; > System.out.println(mySSNumber); // :-( }} > > Progress. A number like 089_89_8989 would be even more progressive. -- Eric Sosman esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid