X-Received: by 10.66.246.229 with SMTP id xz5mr1898449pac.34.1406732239249; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.51.3 with SMTP id t3mr8314qga.27.1406732239155; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!h18no10491733igc.0!news-out.google.com!b3ni469qac.1!nntp.google.com!v10no3423209qac.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <jvbts91r2f9onj1e3dbr5lvqp70hmofkum@4ax.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=134.67.8.204; posting-account=v_bJzgkAAADtGdW8BZ7sP-_4aEpZfiWt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.67.8.204
References: <jvbts91r2f9onj1e3dbr5lvqp70hmofkum@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f1379a46-e82e-4146-ae3f-e7c16b93f5bd@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Java blunders
From: w.tom.adams@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:57:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:29441

Probably not the kind of blunder that you had in mind, but:

Creating a complier to very high, mostly machine-proved, standards, and then turning around and producing an web applet system that is perhaps the most vulnerable in history.  How ironic can you get?