Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:34:22 +0200
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <erdcuuFimolU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <87o9tgo0a9.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <er9hnkFql1qU1@mid.individual.net> <oiov2l$1nso$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oip9ms$tkh$1@dont-email.me> <oipgdi$j5k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: individual.net qfhwu8kvjxv/btfURVvWjwh3Q9bFyPLPbbE0lhGu0jZbim1vM=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jqwNgIvYBxJ+XMTUQJ3RjdXIvrk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
In-Reply-To: <oipgdi$j5k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:36737

On 26.06.2017 01:19, Arne Vajh=C3=B8j wrote:
> On 6/25/2017 5:28 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
>> On 6/25/2017 2:23 PM, Arne Vajh=C3=B8j wrote:
>>> On 6/25/2017 6:31 AM, Robert Klemme wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> A few minor remarks: brackets around comparisons are not needed.
>>>
>>> Not necessary.
>>>
>>> But actually recommended in the traditional Java coding convention.

> I will though point to it if somebody suggests the
> opposite convention.

Which I didn't do.  Just for the record...

Cheers

	robert