Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 14:16:15 +0100
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <edc810FmmbfU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <e69219b6-6d90-4d99-9e0c-485e867fded4@googlegroups.com> <o4p1ae$4bv$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net i/6eVch/cCQhzDqdeRr3Tgj7+2XATJAL/XAgohxTlRgZW8Bzo=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u1T9ldkQ7xK+lAhXshpNv3maUTQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
In-Reply-To: <o4p1ae$4bv$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:36169

On 06.01.2017 22:15, Eric Sosman wrote:

>     The "The" parts of these method names don't communicate much, and
> seem to be little more than clutter.  (Why not "getThatWeight" or
> "getAPrice"?)  It would be more usual to use names like "getModel"
> and "getSize" instead.

Another remark about naming of methods and fields: the current state of 
affairs does not adhere to the Java Beans spec and usual convention for 
getters and setters.  So it would be

private String model;

public String getModel() {
   return model;
}

Kind regards

	robert
-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/