Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Simple example for nested "new" expressions?
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:57:17 +0200
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <dnegjuFl516U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <nested-new-20160416024157@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: individual.net 7SktNc/o1cCjlk+/xaMLSAEcX+uZxxgJaZuxrBAMkvanWhwVM=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9jdq1XWxl8IN2WTitYI38SsiTu8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To: <nested-new-20160416024157@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:34151

On 16.04.2016 04:09, Stefan Ram wrote:
>    I am searching for a simple example for the nesting of =C2=BBnew=C2=AB=

>    expressions, but it should not require the explanation of
>    certain =C2=BBadvanced=C2=AB features, such as exceptions, GUI
>    classes, type arguments or class declarations.

I do not understand why one would want to teach "nested new=20
expressions".  What is so special about invoking new for constructor=20
arguments?  Basically you have a constructor invocation and pass on=20
references.  One or more of those references just happen to point to=20
objects just created on the spot themselves.

You can do this, but it seems to me as meaningless as to teach about=20
nested new:

   final Long l =3D new Long(new Integer(123));
   final Long[] a =3D new Long[] { new Long(234) };
   final Long[] b =3D { new Long(345) };

Kind regards

	robert


--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/