X-Received: by 10.236.13.36 with SMTP id a24mr2241995yha.50.1386027069755; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:31:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.8.42 with SMTP id o10mr372815iga.3.1386027069713; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:31:09 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!p15no31589qaj.0!news-out.google.com!p7ni7183qat.0!nntp.google.com!p15no31586qaj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:31:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3f12b042-9120-4dd3-821a-f815578c3764@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.129; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.129 References: <4wTWc.18629$cx.18110@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <2dd11538-00b2-42e0-8ddf-bdb6263478b4@googlegroups.com> <4dfd478f-58ef-4317-a313-7cddfa16d4b0@googlegroups.com> <5297f799$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <0823db40-389b-4f41-8aa0-b3f283b4c7a9@googlegroups.com> <0905f2d3-dbe8-4fc4-8324-ae36262d42a0@googlegroups.com> <1ibxvrati43m0$.1obb9na9d8r0n.dlg@40tude.net> <3f12b042-9120-4dd3-821a-f815578c3764@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! From: Lew Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 23:31:09 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 3694 X-Received-Body-CRC: 548539840 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26703 On Friday, November 29, 2013 5:12:36 PM UTC-8, pchr...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > On Friday, 29 November 2013 18:58:04 UTC, Joerg Meier wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:01:24 -0800 (PST), pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > > > I may have a tab or a new line out of place but I wouldn't go as far= =20 > > > as to say that its non standard, against coding conventions or unplea= sant=20 > > > to read just because of that. The google browser seems to add spaces= =20 > > > to it anyway. >=20 > > Well of course YOU don't think anything is wrong with it, you're the on= e > > who wrote it! If you knew you were doing it wrong you wouldn't have don= e it > > in the first place. >=20 > > You asked which coding conventions you didn't follow, and now you have = your > > answer. If you'd now like to argue that you didn't mean to follow some > > conventions in the first place, it seems silly that you asked about it = at > > all. >=20 > I didn't say there is nothing wrong with it, I realise its a little bit u= ntidy but I didn't think it to be all that bad that I'd be pulled up about = it.=20 It was. The conventions have been published for a decade and a half, more or less. = You should be familiar with them. > And I haven't had the answer actually, I still don't know to which coding= conventions are being referred. All I have been told is that the coding co= nventions which are being referred too require a) spaces around binary oper= ators and b) four spaces for indentation. Why, the standard Java coding conventions that have been around probably si= nce before you ever hear of Java, of course. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconv-138413.html=20 You should be grateful for the information. --=20 Lew