Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 23:22:42 +0100
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <bo9gliFams9U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <slrnlhoufj.rhr.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <531e650b$0$298$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <slrnlhu6ls.rhr.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <531f8898$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: individual.net ReQZWC62NMTY/Kpj0NqhVQmwX/PxslomSODPiEUrc8PV3Fxsw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tjqnuov9kzhqLFJ5DbFrtuyAMdI=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
In-Reply-To: <531f8898$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:27733

On 03/11/2014 11:05 PM, Arne Vajh=C3=B8j wrote:

> But I find it difficult to understand how it can happen
> in Java (it could easily happen in a language that allows
> you to allocate arrays on the stack).

We're talking about the compiler here - not the JRE.  Or are you saying=20
that a program in a language which allows to allocate arrays on the=20
stack also requires more stack space during compilation?  I don't see=20
how that would be related.

Confused.

	robert