Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Robert Klemme Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Another approach to lambdas Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 07:36:40 +0200 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net NBVmT9VZinK9DhTerJHYSg0Md4sNtfzVhVPsDn2obA3C5tIw0= Cancel-Lock: sha1:2Yc/Gs9o9ujsoa09Sxc21L3MVXM= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130717-1, 17.07.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:24751 On 17.07.2013 23:45, Sebastian wrote: > Am 17.07.2013 04:02, schrieb Arved Sandstrom: >> http://www.infoq.com/news/2013/07/el3 > > I like the EL syntax: ((x,y) -> x+y)(4, 5) > > This reads like a real functional expression, no clutter with ".apply()" > etc. A pity this wasn't possible in Java. It will be soon. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/lambda/lambda-state-4.html Cheers robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/