NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:06:08 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:06:07 +0100
From: lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk">
Organization: Trollbusters 3
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Java EE Architecture
References: <69e1528a-aa62-41ce-88e5-1540f437e89e@googlegroups.com> <qMCdnd-cQ4RiAcvPnZ2dnUVZ7tudnZ2d@bt.com> <l3ljnp$i9c$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <Qsydne-OrL7R8sPPnZ2dnUVZ7sidnZ2d@bt.com> <44SdnR1nzv406sPPnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <YPGdnVXVhNabFMPPnZ2dnUVZ7tKdnZ2d@bt.com> <525f31cc$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <r7udnfKuf9XNBcLPnZ2dnUVZ7s-dnZ2d@bt.com> <5260884b$0$306$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <526088c4$0$306$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In-Reply-To: <526088c4$0$306$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <_6OdnVbeIrhtdv3PnZ2dnUVZ8rQAAAAA@bt.com>
Lines: 57
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-VIZiyrQ+zxSDQWSK6dMCPpsdiTySearq4kOH6xn7E4/7ayShrffAbxZgBR78eddbBeOwziw2sv8Tcau!FOsHKpxWPcNrvYqIyby88xn3ViZygRBs3z+RQFAgEMT/5b87TGsW2FW0SrDj5Xo8y4GVDBn9+aHl
X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3167
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26371

On 18/10/13 02:02, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 9:00 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 10/17/2013 3:57 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>> On 17/10/13 01:39, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> On 10/16/2013 8:39 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>>>> On 16/10/13 12:24, Qu0ll wrote:
>>>>>> "lipska the kat"  wrote in message
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> I think that depends on the system in question.
>>>>
>>>> And the fact that you have never had the need for a Person class does
>>>> not imply that no case exist where it is needed.
>>>
>>> I'd bet the farm that I could come up with a better name for *any*
>>> concept, in any model.
>>
>> Apparently not. See below.
>>
>>>> Example: in Denmark we have something called Central Person Register
>>>> for
>>>> all danes. I find it very likely that they have a Person class, because
>>>> they deal with persons.
>>>
>>> Good grief I hope not
>>>
>>> Citizen,
>>
>> It contain some non-citizens.
>>
>>>          Resident,
>>
>> It contain some non-residents.
>>
>>>                    Fish Pie
>>
>> It does not contain any fish pies.
>
> You could also consider why it is called Central Person Register and
> not Central SomethingElse Register.
>
> Names are important.

Well quite.

> At least if people use the information provided by them.
>
> Arne
>
>


-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net