Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mit.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Lewis Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: new JDK versions Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:38:46 +0100 Organization: Lewis Lines: 19 Message-ID: <87ha5oruhl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8qtsk9t7id2pv6dl56ugepkshhldq8a61t@4ax.com> <2dr0l9hrcpei3nb2ii2h92ahgjntduev6p@4ax.com> <8C14v.219206$ZP3.145822@fx20.iad> <5351b6ca$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <22i7l993as7r9uhcpk8java7os9uib1bkm@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mit.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bdee7d74bb5599725cdba9fe2a37525e"; logging-data="29357"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+swJa9nt7zvDqaxlKPo2b1LYbyDJRsV1M=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6QHhXR9waMoKLglRQbQ/CoaRaao= sha1:4tip09qAf4j+s9AnUeYSl03exR4= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:28143 Roedy Green writes: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:40:00 +0100, "Chris Uppal" > wrote, quoted or indirectly > quoted someone who said : > >> >>security definitely known not to be required or desirable (by anyone) => HTTP >>else => HTTPS > > For web browsing, most people would rather have the speed. Programmers > would prefer to see what is going on clear text. The "speed" increase in general web browsing would be totally and utterly unnoticeable for the great majority of "non secure" needs assuming we're not streaming video over a dodgy link. That said I see no reason for https in the vast majority of cases - especially since it probably still doesnt work....