Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cecil Westerhof Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Not closing a SQL(ite3) connection Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 11:05:45 +0200 Organization: Decebal Computing Lines: 34 Message-ID: <87fucxyx3q.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> References: <87a839um2q.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <874lte1pdj.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <87k229z041.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a1c8c080b2cb6129343ef73ef98e693f"; logging-data="10424"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kkIy9UPyfIbnojTa6E4D1x9XGe4pvRLQ=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Homepage: http://www.decebal.nl/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:rAy2ZpDrWomKw910eBD8FNSuCcA= sha1:03anELQvPsAnMma06SnV97bSJZ8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37140 Andreas Leitgeb writes: > Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> You did not read this part? >> And also not this? > > The net is a busy place. Sometimes, people here do a simple > "optimization" based on the likelihood of helping divided by > effort: > > -) reading a longish description (prose) is "much effort". > -) spotting some fishy code constellation is little effort. > > In many cases, the fishy code constellation is already the > problem, so effort is saved by not reading the prose. > > In those rare cases where the prose happens to be essential > and an answer thus ends up not helpful, it is expected that > the OP will say so and also shorten the prose - afterall > it's him who wants more helpful replies. > > PS: Didn't read this prose? Doesn't matter. It was still less > effort to write, than to wrap my head around the motivation > for each single method. ;-) I try to keep that in mind next time. By the way: you did put me in the right direction. (I should have said that also.) -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof