Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cecil Westerhof Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Which databases are the most used with Java Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:35:05 +0200 Organization: Decebal Computing Lines: 17 Message-ID: <878tins1li.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> References: <87y3qovwjb.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <87tw1bx2c9.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1615173a1409002a85fbdd25ac4b9ead"; logging-data="1700"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+c0U84HyDrS2xoPTqSbeaeACB1WQWNEX0=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Homepage: http://www.decebal.nl/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:yJZj1Z8zVZ0/UeSJSml9J3O2KWA= sha1:yhSfrvw/rSBrlgl1vw7QYdGBuUI= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37191 Robert Klemme writes: > Another aspect of the original question that puzzled me right from the > start: why does it matter at all what JDBC driver is really used. Since > all the types are interfaces anyway _any_ JDBC driver should work with > the wrapper library (except vendor specific things which require > specific types anyway). The only things that differs (as long as you only use generic functionality) is the URLPrefix. That is why I think it is not much work to generate the other concrete classes when the abstract and first concrete class are finished. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof