Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 06:22:56 -0600 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:22:54 +0000 From: lipska the kat Organization: Trollbusters 3 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: ORMs comparisons/complaints. References: <%JGtu.29103$Wm1.26832@fx17.iad> <52c4d306$0$302$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <1YCdnSe_JYu9x1jPnZ2dnUVZ8rydnZ2d@bt.com> Lines: 63 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-ngLh+v7TWF/yUDmF9pdeLy2sqT2jdyEeyIlOXssj8HMBG24Z/CP/Zn9BtlxrzNTZKF1kr06UUNZQzGs!ImNuw1HxwTLeiNptbSaKfwSkY+8S6i1Zc1Fz27uYIHFw6y6El4O7P2coFgtan9afnGRV0F0Q6pI= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3740 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:27174 On 02/01/14 12:09, Qu0ll wrote: > "lipska the kat" wrote in message > news:WJCdnYC44fWipFjPnZ2dnUVZ8sidnZ2d@bt.com... > > > Reply at the end, sorry for the lack of indentation.., > > Well I'm not sure what kind of Java applications you write but in the > world I inhabit the client request "we just want to add one more field > to this form" is guaranteed to send a shiver down the spine as it's > usually followed by "How much?, for adding a single field? you gotta be > kidding". > > To add a single persisted field to an input form requires the > modification of most if not all of the layers of an application. > > Adding a single field to a product line for example would probably > require the modification of all the CRUD methods for that line, not to > mention the inclusion of the field in the search algorithms, modifying > the validation layer, incorporating the field in a logical place in the > HCI, modifying and refactoring the relevant code etc etc. Anything that > can reduce the amount of work required to implement such an apparently > trivial change has got to be a good idea. > > Having said that, I don't used ORMs myself, I mean I've tried, I've > really tried but I start reading the documentation and my eyes glaze > over and I discover that I need to learn 'another' (query) language and > I decide that it's just not worth the effort. Stick to SQL, accept the > overhead and I don't think you can go far wrong. > > Just my 2 euros worth > > -------------------------- > > I find myself actually agreeing with you again. Steady now > Adding even a single field to the underlying data structures is *not* > straightforward at all in a typical Java application. > > I also tend to agree with your comment regarding ORMs v. standard SQL. Twice? In one day? What were you drinking new years eve :-) Only kidding, nice to know it's not just me. > > -- > And loving it, > > -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) > _________________________________________________ > Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com > [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me] -- Lipska the KatŠ: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer, treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net