Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Attila Forth compiler Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 02:58:58 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <2015Jan30.165641@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:36181 On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:56:41 -0500, Anton Ertl wrote: > And otherwise it's also not particularly fast: > > [b8:/tmp:6473] time attila /usr/share/gforth/0.7.0/siev.fs main.fs > 15.672u 0.099s 15.777r 99.96% > [b8:/tmp:6474] time gforth-fast /usr/share/gforth/0.7.0/siev.fs main.fs > 0.244u 0.004s 0.252r 98.50% > gforth-fast? Shouldn't you compare it to gforth-itc? Rod Pemberton