Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Write once C and forth structs
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 04:16:41 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <op.xj16l3cy6zenlw@localhost>
References: <lriebl$ms5$1@dont-email.me> <lrij4s$5jc$1@online.de> <9358212d-746d-4331-b5e5-ded39e632cd7@googlegroups.com> <95f6c055-6369-456d-9356-e5d44c62e47f@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:32838

On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:03:22 -0400, <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The big problem here, is that C structs are limited
> to always starting at 0.

What? ...

In fact, I have absolutely no idea what you're even
attempting to say here.  Please explain what you
mean by:

   "C structs are limited to always starting at 0".

Are you thinking of typedef's?  Even then, that
needs some explanation to know where you're coming
 from and what you're attempting to say.


Rod Pemberton