Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Graphics wordset primitive semantics survey - color specification Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:47:35 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <36679b7a-691a-4bd1-a09d-7701aec0f43c@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:32013 On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:39:59 -0400, Roger Levy wrote: > : colored ( rgba -- ) \ rgba being a packed 32-bit RGBA color. sets > FGCOLOR As an aside, perhaps, you'd like "docolor" or "setcolor" instead of "colored". I'm not black, nor African American, so I don't find "colored" to be offensive, but some of different race or color might, even though the context is non-racist. E.g., I'm Ms. Rather, or any woman, would be offended if the C-word or P-word or F-word was found in programming code. Sensitivity? Rod Pemberton