Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Recommendation of a Forth to embed in C
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 05:07:24 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <op.xeywymlj6zenlw@localhost>
References: <85ca46a5-03d8-41ad-ab7e-8e5c3b781e48@googlegroups.com> <op.xejx4mql6zenlw@localhost> <eqednXF-VdNysc_OnZ2dnUVZ8vidnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.xej213eg6zenlw@localhost> <RYydnQSgz6Dyes_OnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.xele2qe36zenlw@localhost> <b8udnaUPF6ix587OnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.xeo1tdyp6zenlw@localhost> <WtGdnSpmxf33osvOnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.xepvckp66zenlw@localhost> <ljhnsg$hnb$1@dont-email.me> <op.xeyjkjxu6zenlw@localhost> <lji3fa$60r$1@dont-email.me> <op.xeymubgp6zenlw@localhost> <lji5bl$di6$1@dont-email.me> <op.xeyqwpqa6zenlw@localhost> <ljiaed$3gn$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:29909

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 03:09:30 -0400, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/27/2014 2:56 AM, Rod Pemberton wrote:

>> So, AFAICT, the only thing I need to defend myself from is
>> your irrational, ludicrous, and utterly stupid conversation.
>
> Yes, this is clearly the Rod Pemberton I know.

As for which of the various sixty or so "Rod Pemberton" 's in
the world you know, I only know "you" (apparently, Rick Collins,
not Rick Hohensee ...) via comp.lang.forth on Usenet.

> Too bad you just keep posting the same nonsense here
> time and time again.
>

I posted a list of actual court cases provided by a reputable,
University legal department that supported the discussion on
copyrights in good faith, openly, honestly, and truthfully.

I don't recall posting them here previously and a search didn't
pull up a post with them by me for this group.  There was a
mention of Franklin v. Apple a few years back here by me, but
no one replied to that mention, or corrected the mistake with
that court case then, or anywhere else for that matter.  Re-read
if you think it did.  You cited something else you thought applied
which you recollected ...

So, what "same nonsense here time and time again"?  Expound.

Is it anything like your non-sense on non-topical microprocessors?


Rod Pemberton