Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: A Forth Poem by Julian Noble, inscribed into an old copy of Scientific Forth Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:58:51 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 68 Message-ID: References: <1352df91-d261-456c-8dfe-36763bf2ba2f@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:28755 On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:33:21 -0500, AKE wrote: > I recently found a reasonably priced second-hand copy of Julian Noble's > Scientific Forth on the Internet and have just received it in the post. > > To my delight, it has a lengthy inscription, hand-written, and signed by > him, and dated 26 April 1992. > > I'm re-printing it here for the interest of other Forthers. There is > one word (a name perhaps?) in the last verse that I'm not sure I can > make out. I've put these in parentheses. If anyone can think of a > different reading, please do suggest. > > - Assad > > =================== > > To Abe, my once and future father-in-law: > > A Prayer for Forth > Could you check some of the words again? > When I undertood a quixotic crusade As far as I know, "undertood" is not a word. It's most likely "undertook" with a 'k' not 'd'. Or, it could be "understood", but that's far less likely. > On behalf of the Forth tongue obscure > I offered this book to the publishing trade - > Who soon beat a path from my door! Seems to be missing 'away' between 'path' and 'from', but it's a poem. So, it might not be present. > O FORTH, they FORTHright endearing concision > They power, thy speed that my book doth convey Thy power? 'They' seems incorrect here. It would seem it should be be 'Thy' and not 'They'. The 'they' in the line above in front of FORTHright is awkward too. It would seem it should be 'the' and not 'they'. FORTHright is usually spelled with a 'w', i.e., Forthwright. FORTHright might be poetic license. But, please, check that one too. > Are these but destined for scorn and derision, > Doomed not to go FORTH into light of day? Seems to be missing 'the' between 'into' and 'light', but it's a poem. So, it might not be present. > O FORTH doth thy star now wane in declension? > Declare it a FALSEhood lest we wax too sad > Pray, (Gresham), thy Law now hold in suspension > That for once the Good may drive FORTH the Bad! > > Julian V. Noble > 26 April 1992 > inscribed in Scientific Forth, Mechum Banks Publishing, 1992 Hope that helps, Rod Pemberton