Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: CASE mis-understanding? Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:53:01 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <52e54d17.461102185@news.demon.co.uk> <530f6242$0$25074$e4fe514c@dreader37.news.xs4all.nl> <7xtxbkmsh0.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <530fa561$0$24919$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:28852 On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 09:46:27 -0500, Andrew Haley wrote: > Albert van der Horst wrote: >> As if that helps with the confusion. > > The question is what WITHIN is for. A c.l.f. post by Julian V. Noble in 1995 says WITHIN was originally defined by Michael Ham of "The Forth Column" in Dr. Dobbs' Journal. In summary, there was a slight change in the definition for ANS for the upper limit from inclusive to exclusive, i.e., from b<=a<=c to b<=a