Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:32:31 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <0e930740-22d8-4e2b-833f-bb5843437d0d@googlegroups.com> <87y4i6rvyc.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <87lhe5sciz.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <8f8f8dd6-efca-4f3e-ac18-ed28bce7524c@googlegroups.com> <40eef114-1b88-4c29-8937-f0a708a8e805@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:40857 On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:02:23 -0400, wrote: > On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 10:29:59 PM UTC-7, Rod Pemberton wrote: >> C captures the essence of all generic microprocessors. Forth, >> instead, usually attempts to impose it's own virtual machine. >> So, in that regard, it would actually suit Forth to be more >> C like. Even Hugh is having difficulty adding functionality to >> Forth without recreating C functionality. He's done so twice >> with projects even though he riles against C-like memory allocation >> for Forth. Anton doesn't even bother attempting to hide from C. > > Nothing that Rod says is true --- he should be ignored. Everything I say is true. > My FMITE processor and the associated LOTD language have quotations > that have access to the parent function's local variables --- I am > not "recreating C functionality" because C doesn't have this > functionality --- the FMITE is intended to obsolete both C and > ANS-Forth in the micro-controller world as both C and ANS-Forth > are lacking quotations. Also, I didn't have any difficulty with > designing the FMITE --- it was easy --- mostly just a matter of > taking the time to do it. I have no idea what FMITE is ... Clearly, I wasn't criticizing it. > I think that it is uncool that people should talk about me in > threads that I'm not involved in, So, you never mentioned me in a thread I wasn't involved in? Whatever ... > saying that I'm "recreating C functionality" (that's not true; It is. You are. I've pointed it out a few times now. Simply denying this doesn't change reality. Rod Pemberton -- Scientists now say we'll experience a mini-ice in 2030. So, I guess we need more global warming today ...