Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Peter Knaggs" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Specifying interfaces of "read-ahead" words Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:39:03 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <6ee6566a-e1a5-4b62-8209-4b4f0613da5c@w4g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <26bbb8c2-d363-42b7-8fe3-37d6ca1fff76@o5g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8c7a470a0c16a8a8641affb1a9a6ce52"; logging-data="31798"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kThFwZ3PoeFmhb0lhOkKX" User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.14 (Win32) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yQltpFqdv1CLIBgGNUUeZzmaGcc= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:19698 On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:10:49 -0000, Mark Wills wrote: > On Feb 11, 8:07 am, "Peter Knaggs" wrote: >> On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:54:32 -0000, Mark Wills >> wrote: >> >> > Sure, but "name" does not come from the _stack_ so why is it >> > shown on the input side of a _stack signature_. >> >> Because it is a "signature" rather than a "stack signature". The input >> stream forms part of the input to the word. > > When did this name/usage change take place? Was it with the adoption > of ANS? ANS refers to it as a "stack notation" (2.2.2) although in "Parsed-text notation" (2.2.3) it then adds the " notation to the stack description. I have always thought of it as a signature, it makes it much easer to reason about the stack operation. -- Peter Knaggs