Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: chipFORTH [Was: PICK changed from 1-based to 0-based?]
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:28:01 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <op.w9l60zq85zc71u@localhost>
References: <7xvby8f6md.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <52bff96e$0$2861$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <x6Gdncg0V-wYul3PnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <2013Dec30.182107@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <DsudnRfhlcfmKFzPnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@supernews.com> <la26g8$iev$1@online.de> <UvqdnUtPsdECP1nPnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@supernews.com> <la4c9j$2hk$1@online.de> <BLudnVNaAN08QFjPnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@supernews.com> <la4qqo$qkl$1@online.de> <YIGdnfdJDPTjEFvPnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <la6png$v0u$1@online.de> <gN2dnTjkOcj4ZlvPnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <12f05881-1ac4-45f1-b476-0179540c6e27@googlegroups.com> <doOdnQrmscNVhUzPnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@supernews.com> <52d145c4.1561442586@news.demon.co.uk> <XemdnacdqL0q0UzPnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@supernews.com> <52d19b8c.1583402972@news.demon.co.uk> <gZednRL8KceXxE_PnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@supernews.com> <9cOdnZElhuXzwU_PnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:27850

On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:12:14 -0500, Andrew Haley  
<andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote:

> By the way, if anyone is interested, there's a much better description
> of chipFORTH and its origins in
>
> Extending the Forth Environment to Single Chip Microprocessors,
> A. P. Haley and C. L. Stephens, proc. Rochester Forth Conference on
> Industrial Automation, June 20-24, 1989.
>

So, if we aren't interested in chipFORTH, this would could only be
possibly useful for help in putting Forth onto processors architectures
 from 1989 or earlier that are still in use today, e.g., the x86 series.

Yes?


Rod Pemberton