Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: ?DUP Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:58:27 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <7xbo2co681.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <3_idnWekjL7WAPbPnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@supernews.com> <2013Oct26.154815@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2013Oct27.134114@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <6YadnfY509sEiPDPnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@supernews.com> <2013Oct28.161930@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2013Oct29.125121@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:26751 On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:29:42 -0400, Andrew Haley wrote: > Not the interminable length of the discussion. One or both of you could end the "discussion" at any point, i.e., it's not really interminable. You might not be willing to end the "discussion," but he might. So, did you want "indeterminable" instead of "interminable"? Rod Pemberton