Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Anyone else wish this was Moderated?
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 06:28:38 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <op.w4v110du0e5s1z@localhost>
References: <3717081b-941f-400f-a27f-6c6558292c06@googlegroups.com> <op.w4t3i0kw0e5s1z@localhost> <bKSdnYpBqcNpusTPnZ2dnUVZ8qudnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.w4u9qlq10e5s1z@localhost> <2qidnfzksPab18fPnZ2dnUVZ8oidnZ2d@supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:26463

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 03:21:42 -0400, Andrew Haley  
<andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote:

> Rod Pemberton <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 06:44:04 -0400, Andrew Haley
>> <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote:

>> [moderation]
>
> That's not moderation is done right: it's
> moderation done wrong.
>
> [...]
>
> That doesn't sound like a well-moderated group.
>

Clyde, I think you may have found a volunteer...

You might want to ask him how and what he would
moderate though, first.  He clearly disagrees
with moderating what is required to keep
comp.lang.forth in compliance with it's
official Usenet charter:

   "Discussion about Forth."

I demonstrated what should be moderated, now snipped.


Rod Pemberton