Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jkn <jkn+nin@nicorp.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 10:10:06 +0100
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <neaoneFp7fqU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <87qzk0nejz.fsf@nightsong.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net KR2+o/zFOkuX4kHYX3lZ+whivnlNIObueWke+z26OoBTWFnU0v
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4ayuNOj0l+EonFtWKAdhbpEhzZM= sha256:TonCdPfkx4OMV8ttLs4ioQ96SAoHCMMUVWTrMgPAGl4=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <87qzk0nejz.fsf@nightsong.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:135345

On 15/08/2026 06:22, Paul Rubin wrote:
> https://dmitry.gr/?r=06.%20Thoughts&proj=12.%20RV
> 
> About various flaws in the RISC-V design.  Not since the days of Erik
> Naggum have I seen a rant like this.  Bellissimo.


Thanks for the link - I can see why you posted it here, heh heh...