Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alexander Skobelev Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Region-based dynamic memory management idea Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 08:27:31 +0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <2014Jun8.152357@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2014Jun8.170536@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <8b516815-aa73-4a26-83f8-c08558eb5c1e@googlegroups.com> <034bf13a-b0ac-45dc-94b1-fb5f2f593c49@googlegroups.com> <2462e7b0-6a5f-4886-b6c7-ca22f14f6651@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="efd28ea8d3ac53b9b410db4f38b6c0ca"; logging-data="24668"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SJjyYLy0p6w259eB/xvYK" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GeTuae0TcJZQzKavG/2mRrSjU54= sha1:v84NqcZ+7/Tddc3Hv3IzeRJyV9E= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:31311 Mark Wills writes: > If you're interested in strings then have a look at my string library > which uses a string stack: > > http://turboforth.net/string_library.html That looks quite interesting, but could you please elaborate on what is a reason for using a separate string stack? It seems that you could implement all these string functions using just plain Forth stack, couldn't you?