Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!rt.uk.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail
From: Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:51:21 +0100
Organization: 1&1 Internet AG
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <lfphnp$8tc$1@online.de>
References: <op.xcj1pdntsu5d0p@david> <lfnl3l$7su$1@dont-email.me> <43003c26-3103-4a1e-820a-f633d9196aab@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd6afa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: online.de 1394625081 9132 93.205.106.250 (12 Mar 2014 11:51:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.11.5
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:29024

Mark Wills wrote:

> Meh. Why not just bite the bullet: Define interpretation semantics for S".
> That would be *far* more useful, since it's in core. Then assert that S\"
> interpretation semantics are that of S" and be done with it.

Oh, Mark, we already do that.  Well, the interpretation semantics is in the 
file wordset, just as with S\".  And of course S\"'s interpretation semantic 
differs from S"'s by interpreting \<char>.

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/