Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Given a string, create word with that name (in ANS Forth)? Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:44:21 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: <87zimv98ne.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> References: <41b6c38e-a2c5-43f9-965b-78f0afdf6ebe@googlegroups.com> <2016Sep22.094048@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <8660pnhfbd.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <861t0bgcat.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <2016Sep23.182601@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <5IOdnRy0kb7IoHvKnZ2dnUU7-afNnZ2d@supernews.com> <2016Sep24.121339@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Sep25.172229@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2aed369a7b4699bde3e169ff4d831123"; logging-data="7161"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18M8NwR4p072ObWxAJKLYED" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4+WcamFQOIR/2QT9ZVrD9f7+LPw= sha1:2Jv10uTITx6pj1eCN98pUP45DMg= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:51287 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: > Anyway, the discussion is about whether making something like NEXTNAME > standard may be a good idea. As an alternative to both NEXTNAME and EXECUTE-PARSING, what about something like EVAL ( a u -- ), which would simply take a string and run it through the text interpreter? The BLOCKS system has to be able to do something like that already.