Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Is there a free version of Forth that uses the exact same words as "Starting Forth" on Forth Inc.'s site? Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:49:54 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <87y3v767ct.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <4403f2de-29ba-44dd-acaf-639949d0e3c8@googlegroups.com> <7e93440d-5020-4f4c-bdc6-8666e2b1f975@googlegroups.com> <2017Apr9.161649@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <87vaqd8fwn.fsf@nightsong.com> <2017Apr10.081959@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="607d379701e22f98b32edec84c604265"; logging-data="13405"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Y/JPHy8/bIwOu/ENq9JQe" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:p1Zc5A8Eebs81JJTejMI3ZCvmW0= sha1:2rgq0D6AtwU7ahar4zvTuyJsX+8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:57030 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: > ./configure && make > is the right way to build from a tarball. Aha, ok. I hit some errors doing this with the Debian source package but will try with your tarball. > 0.7.3 takes 45s real time (41s CPU time; this is on a system with SSD > and sufficient RAM; what is it doing in the 4s time difference? The compiler is the only difference I can think of. Your machine is a little faster than mine, and mine doesn't have an SSD. > For 0.7, probably. For the development version, it's should work (28s > real time, 55s user time in the i5-6600k), but if you encounter any > problems, try non-parallel make (and if you can create a somewhat > reproducable bug, please report it). Cool, thanks.