Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Editors Used for Forth Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:12:57 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <87wpcpmmcm.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <2017Feb17.001644@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="65e021e111bec3bc680312fde7663eab"; logging-data="30832"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GolJbFbdwjulWHh6Rvhwc" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:snpDkvRz7JsgqFIfdXoAz6zaYYg= sha1:pjsBNb2CHMMwfDlMU/VbAYnIIsc= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:54912 rickman writes: > Yes, I've been meaning to switch to Emacs for some time now, "I use emacs, which might be thought of as a thermonuclear word processor... If you are a professional writer... emacs outshines all other editing software in approximately the same way that the noonday sun does the stars. It is not just bigger and brighter; it simply makes everything else vanish." --Neal Stephenson, 1998 In the Beginning was the Command Line via: http://www.danfowler.net/resources/emacs_talk/