Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Astronomy and programming languages Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:20:32 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <87wp8rmgj3.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <2017Jun3.110911@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <0d8d485a-0917-4211-815c-043bb970db4a@googlegroups.com> <2017Jun3.164811@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0679ba8967ae5b42197d6671ba4db2ef"; logging-data="17866"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+KHcDWvVEgFjq1D0p3Wq51" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MSit9q83jKN514BQqVo/iq2BDOU= sha1:yIcGaM4GucKkx6rPpG8INqqv2zQ= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:60312 Andrew Haley writes: > C seems to be able to manage small systems and very large systems with > the same language; I don't see why Forth shouldn't be able to do the > same. There's lots of legacy C code still being used and maintained on big systems, but I've convinced myself that the main new uses of C, like those of Forth, are on small systems. As a large-server programmer I've worked with lots of productive and successful programmers who arrived on the scene later than we did. They typically use languages like Ruby and Javascript all day long, without ever having seen a line of C in their life.