Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Is there a free version of Forth that uses the exact same words as "Starting Forth" on Forth Inc.'s site? Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 13:50:00 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <87vaqd8fwn.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <4403f2de-29ba-44dd-acaf-639949d0e3c8@googlegroups.com> <7e93440d-5020-4f4c-bdc6-8666e2b1f975@googlegroups.com> <2017Apr9.161649@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b16989435b88b0831ddb8cc29a2fc759"; logging-data="15948"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+PwrggrHtu8j5uLzpylvgU" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BNg4T+GWIAhHf1ujOj2Cw5qDqq8= sha1:UweCc3l8UI0Y+WU97LgDoOlUxaY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:56946 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: > On a 4GHz Core i5-6600k, without parallel make (i.e., pretty much > using only one core): > > time ./BUILD-FROM-SCRATCH > ... > real 0m55.657s > user 0m47.832s > sys 0m1.880s Hmm, is ./BUILD-FROM-SCRATCH the right way to build gforth? I had been using "./configure; ./make" and getting successful builds some of the time, errors at others. I just tried ./BUILD-FROM-SCRATCH and got: make: *** No rule to make target 'doc/gforth.ds', needed by 'doc/gforth.texi'. Stop. after about 20 seconds. This is from the Gforth 0.7.2 in the Debian 8 source repository. (Added) With the 0.7.3 tarball from your TU-Wien site and after installing texlive, ./BUILD-FROM-SCRATCH took about 36 sec on both an i7-3770 and 40 sec on an E3-1230v3, both of which should be a little slower on 1 core than your i5-6600K. I wonder why it builds faster on the slower machines. I'm using GCC 6 if that might be te difference Also, does parallel make mess anything up? Thanks.