Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: eForth specific words? Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:07:55 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <87tw7dhq2c.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <5a233dca-0c96-4ad8-8896-a6f340de9640@googlegroups.com> <7f673166-d6ed-4ea1-b2ce-3fcb19aa074c@googlegroups.com> <87o9xmiyc1.fsf@nightsong.com> <87bmtmilpt.fsf@nightsong.com> <87y3wqgdqq.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="002c202f405a6329a059cf0e1b3372bc"; logging-data="25491"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198bOc3JPYU1uxlEIBq3yeB" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:F4CdVzZJ+TX0FwF5e+u+IY6dBW8= sha1:AFjnwERMkKifunZd96AOseTsR3w= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:55281 Cecil Bayona writes: > I don't know which version was available so I can't say 100% but if > Juergen gave out some early copies for people to proof read before the > final release that might be the source of the leak. I guess that is possible. Juergen would probably know how to tell, if anyone does.