Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Looking for some help with this gforth program. Thanks! Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:02:21 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: <87shxioj4i.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> References: <6548d185-2c31-40a4-bfa9-a3c353e9fa5d@googlegroups.com> <1f0a9579-b955-4de5-85be-3b26aa0f9723@googlegroups.com> <87wpmy4tno.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <2016May15.123405@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <5fc58bbc-d742-4b25-aa89-6bfdcfc3d619@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="589dd00be5ee573d7046ed589be3c50c"; logging-data="26967"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19NfZ7DKPfv+BYKdc4wNHOK" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sVTpMJI1qCkwg+houapNUWEozyo= sha1:gGNPC4v5NmJxFXFKoJrfXtTXpmY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:47174 rickman writes: > We were discussing the suitability of the x86 processor. Yes, I > generalized to any processor intended to run C, but a 6805 > CPU.... really? I don't think it was really designed to run C. I don't think the x86 was originally designed to run C either, particularly the original 16 bit versions. Later updates and extensions made it much more C friendly.