Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Really?
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:01:06 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <87r337uoal.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <1239a88b-a574-401b-9454-50ac7e000049@googlegroups.com> <o7f76l$919$1@dont-email.me> <vJ-dnXscJuTdVQbFnZ2dnUU7-ePNnZ2d@supernews.com> <o7hb55$u0u$1@dont-email.me> <o7he3k$sno$1@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <589c77b9.95886950@news.eternal-september.org> <o7huog$au5$1@dont-email.me> <589c8956.100395863@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ae6d63b52a7a7bba67f03087b82363c7"; logging-data="22412"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vGS2iNintJyprAslUtJkc"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ziv7qAtxuqEr8AKost49/+Ly3pM= sha1:GxF4VBRYd5pk2S+nxZ1dzoPo1n0=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:54755

stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) writes:
> The safety-critical version of DcocGen, DocGen/SC, has formally
> parsed stack comments since the year 2000.

Does it compare the stack comment with the code?