Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Moving JSON around. Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:18:48 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <87poibkrh3.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <9520efbe-f7e6-46b9-a052-7c0b99b0a352@googlegroups.com> <207762ab-6662-4825-a20a-173ff426c521@googlegroups.com> <87y3x1kwlo.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="81de832764bfaa8baec00932e485e613"; logging-data="18664"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196WcimpEUC/jBl/TymESzm" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cCm8e8Taal6tJ75XfIi6jvCEGKs= sha1:aj3InBcL4BvUowlHy1LC7kMjq1w= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:55040 Ron Aaron writes: >> C++ rapidjson (gcc 6.3, gcc -O3, e3-1230v3): 0.536 sec > That's interesting. I've had a very bad time using rapidjson in a > customer's project, as it unexpectedly lets go of things, and throws > asserts which seem incorrect. I'm switching (as we speak) to a > different library. Thanks, that's good to know. I'd never used rapidjson before and it worked ok for that test but idk any more about it. Can I ask what you're switching to? C++ doesn't seem like the greatest environment for munging tons of json data anyway, of course.