Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Kilocore Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:59:55 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <87mvm6pflw.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <2016Jun23.163143@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Jun24.122108@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Jun24.175754@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Jun25.161016@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Jun26.115842@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Jun27.164023@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9988e31d1753938c645af9c6e3a8ee39"; logging-data="16684"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187o7X6L4RfJd2CNosSIP0N" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KUVhA454wUGUMrpfSJoaC5MRhXU= sha1:SsOYLg/oKJ/Z1C9a3JBb7Q66cqE= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:48583 Andrew Haley writes: >> There is a reason why they used 32 nm process, lower cost. > It's a PhD project. Universities do VLSI design, and they sometimes > do interesting things like this. But fabbing something in 32nm is still quite expensive. They had to have more justification to get it funded than "this sounds cool".