Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Any ideas on faster TLS ?
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:15:15 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <87k28aiy64.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <o90deq$vvp$1@dont-email.me> <yuednW2Kf9GZZC7FnZ2dnUU7-KHNnZ2d@supernews.com> <o911tb$rfl$1@dont-email.me> <yPCdnc9TmsTLrynFnZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <o91bst$vj5$1@dont-email.me> <FeydncNQp7DG2ynFnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="896a6ec9e8c0bc62dcd4ea840e8902d1"; logging-data="26095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+e2ZddYvOInPYmY95sp68p"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tUWksMXal8RG+YiJLMpDejVIfz8= sha1:TOn0DETyjhIDp4W6kRs49ID2HQo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:55235

Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
> Are we looking at the cost of an L1 cache miss, or something greater?

If FS is being reloaded every time, that is quite expensive, or used to
be.