Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: new embedded forth Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:30:30 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <87h99kg615.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> References: <5139e808-ac86-4b5d-8b2c-7e6e99f06888@googlegroups.com> <87k2ehhb0m.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87twdkg9he.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="590ea01354cf4bcbcd857d7ebbd88128"; logging-data="6012"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jH80upfNLQu6U6ly74jGh" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DjksQGJ0m7HqcmmCe1Z+Z/Vs+WE= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:50921 albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) writes: > The Egel/noforth project has 4 examples involving low power modes > of the 430. Nice! > There is no way ARM is attacking that market any time soon. They are, and they're competitive, but I have the impression that it's more complicated to program because of additional setup for the modes and stuff. I dunno though, I'm just a server jock.