Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Could Forth be getting a bit of traction? Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:48:57 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <87fv2otihy.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> References: <8ca7934b-ecc4-48f0-8e97-8f1240d4c997@googlegroups.com> <998e315e-9945-4bbb-b512-4d5503746525@googlegroups.com> <2eae1f37-03de-46cb-aec5-982f71867270@googlegroups.com> <53e77c00-3c0d-449e-b8f2-9e274581d01b@googlegroups.com> <52bb77a4-a943-4d1b-a8a2-26a12d38f95a@googlegroups.com> <6a423e09-f98a-4891-9816-39b4ca33365b@googlegroups.com> <62e1ded5-1982-4887-95e5-113c5f47eee1@googlegroups.com> <03bbb5ce-d533-46d5-ab0f-861e191deb3d@googlegroups.com> <5ceeed2c-264c-4849-adfb-3b9c8f7f15d3@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4a8d07ad1a0f5884bbd8208f7dcd0e0f"; logging-data="22525"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/fOJrB5b1/0pzCdVWGkxO+" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7Hi9jksgojUK1LnyKi3gcM/oDJQ= sha1:rlEZU8swvtfoLUGf1aGLHufT7U8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:41873 jim.brakefield@ieee.org writes: > A way forward is for the Forth standard to embrace as many higher > level abstractions (both data and code) as possible and state the > meaning. I think part of the Forth spirit is to collapse away abstraction rather than add more. This is both enabling and limiting, in their own ways.