Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Stack Operator Symbols Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:23:44 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 6 Message-ID: <87fundl0i7.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <4e481228-bd80-4e39-a629-90a690e50756@googlegroups.com> <20161027191345.4f524e44@_> <-Lmdneii--uHXI_FnZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@supernews.com> <87d1ijmwc3.fsf@nightsong.com> <874m3un959.fsf@nightsong.com> <1fqdnTibotrDKojFnZ2dnUU7-KnNnZ2d@supernews.com> <87k2cpl42w.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d6d6506fc47485530f29028d3914a747"; logging-data="9756"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18UEhAP9mCccm6BPlir5Jkg" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:H9V4oyU+fSBpFDDV/wbUaf11Bng= sha1:ZQF7WxnYXXeM+GnMI+xWpc/bup8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:52323 Spiros Bousbouras writes: > "you wouldn't write code like this in Forth for any other purpose than > a benchmark". Would you code that function differently if it were for some purpose other than benchmarking?